Friday, 16 March 2012

Note on Nationalism...

An old friend - not politically active but made restive by the prospect of the referendum on "independence" - sends me this extract from George Orwell's 1945 essay on Nationalism.

"Extract from ‘Notes on Nationalism’ – George Orwell Essay 1945

By 'nationalism' I mean first of all the habit of assuming that human beings can be classified like insects and that whole blocks of millions or tens of millions of people can be confidently labelled 'good' or 'bad'. But secondly--and this is much more important--I mean the habit of identifying oneself with a single nation or other unit, placing it beyond good and evil and recognising no other duty than that of advancing its interests.

Nationalism is not to be confused with patriotism. Both words are normally used in so vague a way that any definition is liable to be challenged, but one must draw a distinction between them, since two different and even opposing ideas are involved.

By 'patriotism' I mean devotion to a particular place and a particular way of life, which one believes to be the best in the world but has no wish to force on other people. Patriotism is of its nature defensive, both militarily and culturally.

Nationalism, on the other hand, is inseparable from the desire for power. The abiding purpose of every nationalist is to secure more power and more prestige, NOT for himself but for the nation or other unit in which he has chosen to sink his own individuality.

A nationalist is one who thinks solely, or mainly, in terms of competitive prestige. He may be a positive or a negative nationalist--that is, he may use his mental energy either in boosting or in denigrating--but at any rate his thoughts always turn on victories, defeats, triumphs and humiliations. He sees history, especially contemporary history, as the endless rise and decline of great power units, and every event that happens seems to him a demonstration that his own side is on the upgrade and some hated rival is on the downgrade. But finally, it is important not to confuse nationalism with mere worship of success. The nationalist does not go on the principle of simply ganging up with the strongest side. On the contrary, having picked his side, he persuades himself that it IS the strongest, and is able to stick to his belief even when the facts are overwhelmingly against him. Nationalism is power-hunger tempered by self-deception.

Every nationalist is capable of the most flagrant dishonesty, but he is also--since he is conscious of serving something bigger than himself-- unshakeably certain of being in the right."

It's an essay I have read many times, and it hits the note for me. It runs to over twenty pages in my Penguin edition, but in the extract above almost every sentence contains a gem that could be picked out and applied to today's SNP and camp followers. I particularly I like the bit about Nationalism -v- Patriotism.

"Nationalism is not to be confused with patriotism.........By 'patriotism' I mean devotion to a particular place and a particular way of life, which one believes to be the best in the world but has no wish to force on other people. Patriotism is of its nature defensive, both militarily and culturally. Nationalism, on the other hand, is inseparable from the desire for power."

 Here is the riposte to those brain dead "politicians" who cry "anti-Scottish" every time someone wishes to disabuse them of some foolish notion. It is possible to disagree with Nationalists and still be Scottish: in fact it is frequently necessary.

Orwell was a great observer of politics in a turbulent period in history. He was always acute in his judgements and a great pricker of pomposity. Oh for his pen and his wit to puncture the bloated waistcoat of our puffed up First Panjandrum.......

Wednesday, 14 March 2012

Don't blame us, we're only the government....


Cast your mind back to this time last year. The the unemployment figures were released, and they were bad

UK unemployment stood at 8%.

But, in Scotland, the numbers were marginally less bad, as the number of Scots out of work fell by 16,000 between November 2010 and January 2011, bucking a trend in the rest of the UK.

So, who was responsible? The SNP of course!!!  Who else?

On 16th March 2011, Alex Salmond "...warned the Chancellor not to jeopardise Scotland’s economic recovery in next week’s Budget after new figures showed another drop in unemployment. Mr Salmond insisted the decrease was thanks to his administration’s economic policies.”

NB. Even so Scottish unemployment was 8.1%, slightly more than the UK average of 8%. But the fact that unemployment in Scotland appeared to be falling was evidence enough for the FM to crow and to bark orders to the UK.

Fast foward to 14th March 2012, the unemployment figuers are out and unemployment and they're bad

Unemployment in Scotland has risen by 6,000 in the three months to the end of January. The unemployment rate in Scotland was 8.7% - above the UK average of 8.4%. Numbers in employment in Scotland has actually decreased by 11,000 from November to January. The unemployment total in Scotland is18,000 higher than it was a year ago. Meanwhile, the number of Scots claiming jobseeker's allowance rose to 142,800 in February, 5,400 higher than it was a year ago.

So, who is responsible? Last year it was the SNP wot dunnit as unemployment "fell". This year, as unemployment rises, it's..... the SNP?  No way! ....

It's Westminster innit? The Scottish Government has issued a bold statement from Finance Secretary John Swinney saying; "the figures demonstrate why the UK Chancellor George Osborne needed to take "urgent action to create jobs" in next week's UK Budget". And "The Chancellor needs to change course in next week's Budget, and deliver a 'Plan MacB' approach for the economy”.

For all those decades in opposition the Nationalists were able to promise anything, because there was no danger they would have to make good on any promise. It was, conversely, easy to blame whoever else happened to be in Government. After all, you're in Government, you're responsible. See that labour! See them Tories!! Disgusting. Disgraceful. Whit a bunch! If only us Nats could get hold of the reins of power.

Now the Nationalists have been in power for five years. But, strangely enough, for five years nothing has been their fault.  Things look good..unemployment falls.."we did that!!". Things look not-so-good.. unemployment rises..."Blame Westmonster, blame the union, blame the last Labour administration, blame the Supreme Court, blame the Tories, blame anyone and everyone. But don't blame us. We're only the Government....".

I can't help thinking it's beginning to wear bit thin....


Monday, 12 March 2012

Nicola discovers "the real world"


Brian Taylor of BBC Scotland interviews Deputy FM Nicola Sturgeon.

Wriggling like a good'un, Ms Sturgeon explains why the SNP Government is wonderful and responsible for...well... nothing really....certainly nothing unpopular......it's own entertainments licence legislation, steel for the Forth road bridge purchased furth of Scotland, the collapsed banks, joining the Euro or retaining Sterling gay marriage, the SNP's tendency to call its opponents "anti-Scottish, defence policy. Clarity escapes, responsibility diffuses, problems dissolve, Brigadon is invoked, Denmark exalted, Norway eulogised (Iceland? Ireland? anathema...) magic wands are waved. And blame is placed. Anywhere but Holyrood.

Nicola finds time, inter alia, to criticise other people for saying that "Scotland is too wee and too poor" to survive in "independence" when no-one, except herself, even had a fleeting thought hinting at that position thus confirming my previous observation that it's always the Nats that bring this red herring into any conversation. Freudian transference personified.....

Nicola also finds (18 minutes in) that England would have helped bail out the failed Scottish banks and so saved an "independent" Scotland from bankruptcy. And, did you know, an "independent" Scotland would help the English bail out Barclays if it failed.

Hurrah for England! Hurrah for "interdependence"!

Nicola calls this "the real world".

You can't help thinking that, in the real real world, if "interdependence" is the best solution to the banking and other crises, why would any sane person claim that "independence" is better for the Scottish people? But, y'know what? Nicola didn't give any convincing reasons....






Tuesday, 6 March 2012

Two bald men fighting over a comb

The blessed Vince wants "mansion tax" on houses over £2million value. Gideon George Osborne wants to cut tax for the rich.

The compromise seems to be a tax rise for the rich via the mansion levy and a tax cut for the rich via cutting the 50p level on those who earn over £150,000/year.

Probable result? No real change... but still this gargantuan struggle between titanic forces (Vince and Gideon) leads the news and smothers the budget discussions.

Jorge Louis Borges, the Argentinian novelist and thinker, described the Falklands War as "two bald me fighting over a comb". He could have meant the prize, the Falklands Islands, was not worth the effort.



                              YOU STOLE MA COMB!!!


In the case of the Vince -v- Gideon it means to me, that, whoever wins, the outcome is meaningless. It's a fake battle with a predicted outcome. The aim is to look antagonistic and busy for the benefit of the two party's followers.

In reality it's a pointless waste of energy.


Monday, 5 March 2012

The Arc of Gullibility


In a letter to the Herald, Brian Quail, stalwart of Scottish CND, expresses his believe that Only full independence can rid us of the menace that is the Trident system”. Perhaps Mr Quail missed the report in the Guardian of the previous day that the SNP is considering joining Nato (if they win the referendum which they will not, but that's a different matter). The report also reveals a 2008 survey showing that 53% of SNP supporters agree that staying with Nato is in Scotland’s interests. Even if an "independent" Scotland did not join Nato, there is a strong possibility that the UK Government would pay a generous amount to lease the Faslane facilities and an impoverished new country would gratefullly take the dosh. So, even if the UK is broken up, Trident is likely to stay where it is for the foreseeable future.

It's not surprising that CND and others were intitially taken in by Nationalist promises but I am surprised that they are still clinging to the belief that the SNP will deliver. In its desire to farm votes from any source the SNP has made promises to every protest group and sectional interest imaginable including anti-nuclear weapons, pacifists, (while keeping army and RAF bases) anti-nuclear power, environmentalists, anti-environmentalists, anti-abortion groups, pro-choice Christians, republicans, monarchists, students, teachers (while building no new schools), nurses, pro-business, progressives, homophobes, anti-tax Tories, pro-public service campaigners and a host of local pro and anti-development groups. 

So much contradiction is bound to lead to disappointment, particularly when “independence” is redefined on a daily basis by the whim of the First Minister. 

 Patent NatMed. Cures what ails you. Honest!

I’m no great fan of Trident renewal either: it seems like a lot of dough for very little bread, (especially when we are building aircraft carriers with no planes to put on them!), but I'm very much afraid that Brian Quail and CND must now join the republicans and public sector workers and pro-choice and students, teachers and parents and all the other people who voted SNP in response to promises that their particular brand of snake-oil would cure all ills, and accept that a pro-Nato SNP would never get rid of Trident, any more than it abolished student debt, or abolished the Council Tax or built schools “brick-for-brick” or any other of a string of empty Nationalist promises.

Wednesday, 29 February 2012

Young guns, havin' some fun.......

It's only just over two years, August 2009, since media gunslinger Wild Jim Murdoch spread fear among the citizens of Media City like a loose gun in a bar-room brawl. Jim rode intotown from his old man's BIG M ranch all tooled up and ready to deliver the annual McTaggart lecture, to fire off some warning shots at the BBC and to warn the Corporation that he and his daddy were gunnin' fer it.

Just you wait until the Tory posse arrives, he snarled, the BarBarCee ranch will be under seige and I'll be raiding and harrying you 'til you give up your plum steers and I rustle them off. We're gonna buy the BSkyB ranch and take over the whole county, so you'd better watch yore step!

The young gun was out of its holster and going after senior BBC henchmen and they quaked at his power.

Well today, the gunslinger was run out of town. The sherrif's posse that he thought he had bought has been blabbing to Judge Leveson and the youngster's power base was revealed as diseased and corrupt.

 Young Gun Jim his Pop Big Rupe Murdoch and a red haired moll.

No shoot out at the old corral for this brave boyo. Slinking off to the good old USOFA to keep his head down and lick his wounds and seek the comfort of his daddy's ranch.

to be continued........